« Conspiracy Theory On Barack Obama's Plane Problems | Main | "There Ain't No Stinkin Quotas" »

July 09, 2008

The Gazette Documents a Mark Udall Lie

For almost a year, The Gazette editorial page editor has avoided mentioning Mark Udall's name. 

Today, he even got his name in the editorial page headline "Udall Wants SDS to Stall."  It begins:

   Never mind that five years of extensive study and community discourse have run their course. Never mind that the official public comment period has come and gone. Never mind that the Southern Delivery System, needed for the future water supply of Colorado Springs, has been studied and debated to a point of exhaustion.

   Forget all that, because U.S. Rep. Mark Udall is running for election to the United States Senate. What may be good for his campaign, it appears, holds more weight with the congressman than what's good for the economic welfare of Colorado.

The Gazette is more circumspect than I am.  They never actually called him a liar.  They just documented the lie:

   In his letter, Udall expresses concern that the Southern Delivery System might somehow interfere with a bill he has introduced in the House of Representatives. He wrote: "I am also concerned about the implications for legislation that I have introduced (H.R. 4928) that would require a study of the feasibility of a Fountain Creek storage facility to benefit the communities of Pueblo and along the Lower Arkansas Valley."

   This concern contradicts the language of the very bill Udall references. The bill clearly states that a feasibility study of a Fountain Creek storage facility may not interfere with any study pertaining to the Southern Delivery System. Here are the exact words, from Section 3, of Udall's bill: "The Chief of Engineers shall conduct the study independently from, and shall not affect, any other study relating to - (A) the Fountain Creek watershed; (B) the Fryingpan-Arkansas Project of the State; or (C) the proposed Southern Delivery System Project."

Mark Udall didn't want to have Ben DeGrow host a debate because his blog had used a label "Mark Udall as a Liar,"  He didn't deny that he was a liar.  He couldn't, because every instance was documented.  He is just uncomfortable being publicly called a liar.

Mark Udall is a liar, and like many liars, he is not a careful liar.  His lies are frequent and easily documented.

Of all of the lies that Mark Udall has told, this may be the most dangerous.  In 1998, when Bill Owens was running for Governor, his opponent opined in a debate that if she were elected, Colorado Springs would get no highway funds.  She lost by 6,000 votes.  One wonders if she would have won if she had been willing to treat Colorado Springs fairly.

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516b9a69e200e553ac53a98834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Gazette Documents a Mark Udall Lie:

Comments

The comments to this entry are closed.

About This Site

  • Copyright Notice
    We had a little problem with a new site that published our material as though it was theirs omitting only the links. All items on this blog copyright a watcher on the date published. Fair use exerpting is authorized and encouraged with links back to the original essay.
  • email address
    Avoiding the harvesters: We do have a tipline, so that's a start. At thecoloradoindex, of course, followed by the typical dot com. Sorry to be cryptic, but we've already been bit by spam city and our address only appeared on the net once.
  • Hints and Rules
    One goal of this site is to help Republicans write essays that are as effective as possible, and by that we mean essays have search engine sticking power. Bloggers may wish to look at the Hints and Rules category from time to time.
  • TheColoradoIndex
    A site that promotes other Colorado Republican writers with links. The site also publishes essays that Democrats and their media fans might find unfriendly, but fair. Sometimes substantially identical essays will be written about individual Democrats who participated in a group event. The purpose is not to bore readers but to have individualized searchable essays that will call as much attention to that one individual's actions against the public interest as possible.